I'm learning that top-level traces should use operation_name as well as name, because name is the low-level thing that every trace gets (including child traces like db queries and net requests)!
Also there was an incorrect label in one of these, and validPetPoses was missing it altogether
This will help us disambiguate items like Butterfly Dress with a non-unique name, and also some where the real item name is glitchy so using it as a key is not wise lol
By printing out this logging data, of item names we have that Waka doesn't, vs item names Waka has that we don't, I was able to solve a lot of them with new code in `normalizeItemName`!
Here's the mismatches that are left at time of writing:
```
[Item: Y, Waka: N] No Waka value for NC DTI item "goldenlulumedallion" (43034)
[Item: Y, Waka: N] No Waka value for NC DTI item "faelliebirthdaybagsurprise" (51350)
[Item: Y, Waka: N] No Waka value for NC DTI item "neopets11thbirthdaycommemorativemysterycapsule" (53448)
[Item: Y, Waka: N] No Waka value for NC DTI item "dyeworksblue:iscawig-blue" (70896)
[Item: Y, Waka: N] No Waka value for NC DTI item "mysteriousdoorwithlocks" (75601)
[Item: Y, Waka: N] No Waka value for NC DTI item "grapefruitnecklace" (77779)
[Item: Y, Waka: N] No Waka value for NC DTI item "discofeverbackground" (79250)
[Item: Y, Waka: N] No Waka value for NC DTI item "featherflaredshoes" (80047)
[Item: Y, Waka: N] No Waka value for NC DTI item "dyeworksredradioactivemutantmarkings" (80441)
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "7thbirthdaycakeslice#1"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "7thbirthdaycakeslice#2"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "7thbirthdaycakeslice#3"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "8thbirthdayrainbowcupcake"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "8thbirthdaysparklercupcake"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "8thbirthdaytiedwithabowcupcake"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "babyspringdress"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "butterflydress(fromfaeriefestivalevent)"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "discofever"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "dyeworksblue:iscawig"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "dyeworksred:radioactivemutantmarkings"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "featherflairedshoes"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "festivebooktree"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "floralblackcardigan"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "grapefruitneckace"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "mysteriousdoorwithlocksbackground"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "valiantchampionwings"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "waxcrayonwig"
[Item: N, Waka: Y] No NC DTI data for Waka item "youngsophiesdress"
```
Oops, I missed something important about the Sheets API here! This was causing us to set `{value: undefined}` for some items, which serialized as `{}`.
Just a little experiment to see this working in prod! I don't have permission to actually use this data yet, or a UI for it, just mostly want to see it hooked up to the Sheets API correctly and check the prod cache behavior.
New items have ?v= in the query string, which denied requesting them from the outfit thumbnail API route. Now, we allow any query string.
Also, I started allowing PNGs. I don't think any should actually come through here in practice? But it seems safe and forward-looking.
Huh, I guess TNT changed the folder name from `object` to `items` for new SVGs? Like, some of the old SVGs still are in `objects`, but…
Hmm, I wonder if I should re-run old manifests at some point? I wonder if maybe like, _everything_ changed, and we're just holding onto old URLs now…
When we decided to start out with /api/assetProxy, we didn't know how much the load would be in practice, so we just went ahead and tried it! Turns out, it was too high, and Vercel shut down our deployment 😅
Now, we've off-loaded this to a Fastly CDN proxy, which should run even faster and more efficiently, without adding pressure to Vercel servers and pushing our usage numbers! And I suspect we're gonna stay comfortably in Fastly's free tier :) but we'll see!
(Though, as always, if Neopets can finally upgrade their own stuff to HTTPS, we'll get to tear down this whole proxy altogether!)
Going through matchu@openneo.net was hitting a spam filter on that email host's redirect… Gmail seems to be more okay with it, so I'm sending straight there, and crossing my fingers 🤞
We got bit by the "can't run anything after the response finishes" thing
so I'm just forcing the response to wait for Honeycomb submit to finish
I hope this isn't like, just awful for perf lol. but puts to honeycomb seem fast?
I figure we can get even better messages than "Access denied" in case this happens again!
Also, I need a new deployment to trigger the new env vars, so why not make it count? :)
My hypothesis is that this missing `await` is causing prod Vercel to cut off the request before the async upload finishes. Omitting this `await` was a mistake, so I'm just adding it right in!
I also add logging for the success case. That way, if this isn't actually a fix, I can at least watch the logs and confirm whether the app thinks it's getting to here.
