Switch back to $20/mo copy
This commit is contained in:
parent
da8cd8eda9
commit
cb55881029
1 changed files with 9 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ function OutfitUrlsPage() {
|
|||
<p>
|
||||
Hi, friends! Sorry for the trouble 😓 In short, by switching to the
|
||||
new outfit URLs below, we'll decrease our hosting costs by
|
||||
$30/month! 🙏
|
||||
$20/month! 🙏
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
This change applies to <strong>image embeds</strong>, for{" "}
|
||||
|
@ -81,20 +81,22 @@ function OutfitUrlsPage() {
|
|||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Since then, we've grown a lot, and our Amazon costs have increased a
|
||||
lot too! These days, it costs about $30/month to serve outfit images
|
||||
lot too! These days, it costs about $35/month to serve outfit images
|
||||
from S3—and $20 of that is just to <em>store</em> our millions of
|
||||
outfit images, including the ones nobody visits 😅
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
So, we've moved our apps to a new, more cost-efficient way to share
|
||||
outfit images! But, until we delete the old images from Amazon S3
|
||||
altogether, we're still paying $30/month <em>just</em> to support
|
||||
the old <code>amazonaws.com</code> URLs.
|
||||
outfit images! It's decreased those costs by a lot! But, until we
|
||||
delete the old images from Amazon S3 altogether, we're essentially
|
||||
paying $20/month <em>just</em> to support the old{" "}
|
||||
<code>amazonaws.com</code> URLs.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
I looked hard for a way to redirect the old Amazon URLs to our new
|
||||
service, but it seems to not be possible, and it seems like
|
||||
$30/month could be better spent another way 😖
|
||||
service, but it seems to not be possible. And it seems like
|
||||
$20/month could be better spent another way, especially when we
|
||||
think about hosting these images long-term 😖
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
We haven't removed these images from Amazon yet, so old image URLs
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue