From cb55881029a35543d74009ad13234bd31d4e1e6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matchu <matchu1993@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:26:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Switch back to $20/mo copy

---
 src/app/OutfitUrlsPage.js | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/app/OutfitUrlsPage.js b/src/app/OutfitUrlsPage.js
index 08bd9b5..14fcd4d 100644
--- a/src/app/OutfitUrlsPage.js
+++ b/src/app/OutfitUrlsPage.js
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ function OutfitUrlsPage() {
           <p>
             Hi, friends! Sorry for the trouble 😓 In short, by switching to the
             new outfit URLs below, we'll decrease our hosting costs by
-            $30/month! 🙏
+            $20/month! 🙏
           </p>
           <p>
             This change applies to <strong>image embeds</strong>, for{" "}
@@ -81,20 +81,22 @@ function OutfitUrlsPage() {
           </p>
           <p>
             Since then, we've grown a lot, and our Amazon costs have increased a
-            lot too! These days, it costs about $30/month to serve outfit images
+            lot too! These days, it costs about $35/month to serve outfit images
             from S3—and $20 of that is just to <em>store</em> our millions of
             outfit images, including the ones nobody visits 😅
           </p>
           <p>
             So, we've moved our apps to a new, more cost-efficient way to share
-            outfit images! But, until we delete the old images from Amazon S3
-            altogether, we're still paying $30/month <em>just</em> to support
-            the old <code>amazonaws.com</code> URLs.
+            outfit images! It's decreased those costs by a lot! But, until we
+            delete the old images from Amazon S3 altogether, we're essentially
+            paying $20/month <em>just</em> to support the old{" "}
+            <code>amazonaws.com</code> URLs.
           </p>
           <p>
             I looked hard for a way to redirect the old Amazon URLs to our new
-            service, but it seems to not be possible, and it seems like
-            $30/month could be better spent another way 😖
+            service, but it seems to not be possible. And it seems like
+            $20/month could be better spent another way, especially when we
+            think about hosting these images long-term 😖
           </p>
           <p>
             We haven't removed these images from Amazon yet, so old image URLs