forked from OpenNeo/impress
Clarify a note in the deploy playbook
Looking back at this now I'm just like. Oh right, of course, we don't have passwordless access to *become root*, so of course Ansible's strategy of becoming root and then running the playbook step was failing!
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d63b1f725
commit
bdd381df44
1 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -76,9 +76,10 @@
|
||||||
# NOTE: This uses the passwordless sudo rule we set up in deploy:setup.
|
# NOTE: This uses the passwordless sudo rule we set up in deploy:setup.
|
||||||
# We write it as a command rather than using the built-in `systemd` Ansible
|
# We write it as a command rather than using the built-in `systemd` Ansible
|
||||||
# module, to make sure we're invoking it exactly as we wrote in that rule.
|
# module, to make sure we're invoking it exactly as we wrote in that rule.
|
||||||
# TODO: I'm not sure why it works to write `sudo` in the command instead of
|
#
|
||||||
# `become_user: root`, which complains about the missing sudo password, which
|
# NOTE: We use `sudo` instead of `become_user: root`, because we don't have
|
||||||
# we already fixed for the rest of the playbook I thought?
|
# permission to *become* the root user; we only have permission to run this
|
||||||
|
# one command as them.
|
||||||
- name: Restart the app
|
- name: Restart the app
|
||||||
become: no
|
become: no
|
||||||
command: sudo systemctl restart impress
|
command: sudo systemctl restart impress
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue