Matchu
6e09b8bc10
Confirmed features:
* Output (retrieval, sorting, etc.)
* Name (positive and negative, but new behavior)
* Flags (positive and negative)
Planned features:
* users:owns, user:wants
Known issues:
* Sets are broken
* Don't render properly
* Shouldn't actually be done as joined sets, anyway, since
we actually want (set1_zone1 OR set1_zone2) AND
(set2_zone1 OR set2_zone2), which will require breaking
it into multiple terms queries.
* Name has regressed: ignores phrases, doesn't require *all*
words. While we're breaking sets into multiple queries,
maybe we'll do something similar for name. In fact, we
really kinda have to if we're gonna keep sorting by name,
since "straw hat" returns all hats. Eww.
44 lines
1.1 KiB
Ruby
44 lines
1.1 KiB
Ruby
class Item
|
|
module Search
|
|
module Fields
|
|
class SetField < Field
|
|
def initialize(*args)
|
|
super(*args)
|
|
@values = {true => Set.new, false => Set.new}
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def <<(filter)
|
|
if filter.value.respond_to?(:each)
|
|
filter.value.each do |value|
|
|
add_value(value, filter.positive?)
|
|
end
|
|
else
|
|
add_value(filter.value, filter.positive?)
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def to_flex_params
|
|
{
|
|
key => nil_if_empty(@values[true]),
|
|
:"negative_#{key}" => nil_if_empty(@values[false])
|
|
}
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
private
|
|
|
|
def add_value(value, is_positive)
|
|
if @values[!is_positive].include?(value)
|
|
raise Item::Search::Contradiction,
|
|
"positive #{key} and negative #{key} both contain #{value}"
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
@values[is_positive] << value
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def nil_if_empty(set)
|
|
set unless set.empty?
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|