Emi Matchu
71f0aa4908
Oh huh, I guess most of the new items we had when I rewrote this were Maraquan, and I didn't test enough on standard species-specific items. Before this change, partially-modeled items for standard pets would appear as fully modeled, because the presence of the "nonstandard" color Orange (because of the Orange Chia) meant that the "standard" key didn't actually have any unique bodies (it was all `["standard", 47]`). Here, I take my own comments' advice and move away from the standard label as part of the logic. Instead, we look first for nonstandard colors with unique bodies, which we'll call out as modelable; and then check whether there are any basic bodies *not* covered by those special colors. That way, compatibility with the Maraquan Acara (a unique body) means we'll treat Maraquan as a modelable color; and then we'll ignore the basic bodies, even though it *does* fit the basic Mynci, because there aren't any compatible basic bodies that aren't *also* Maraquan bodies. This also means that compatibility with both the Blue Acara and Orange Acara does *not* preclude a normal item from needing basic pets for models: because, while Orange is a slightly nonstandard color in the case of Chia, it doesn't have its own unique body for this item, so we ignore it when predicting compatibility with basic colors. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
fundraising | ||
item | ||
alt_style.rb | ||
application_record.rb | ||
auth_record.rb | ||
auth_user.rb | ||
closet_hanger.rb | ||
closet_list.rb | ||
closet_visibility.rb | ||
color.rb | ||
contribution.rb | ||
item.rb | ||
item_outfit_relationship.rb | ||
nc_mall_record.rb | ||
neopets_connection.rb | ||
neopets_page.rb | ||
outfit.rb | ||
parent_swf_asset_relationship.rb | ||
pet.rb | ||
pet_state.rb | ||
pet_type.rb | ||
species.rb | ||
swf_asset.rb | ||
user.rb | ||
zone.rb |