Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ed5b62e161 Use PetType's created_at to predict who an item might be compatible with
This is a basic attempt at the Vandagyre logic, but also things like
"Maraquan items released before the Maraquan X was released"!

I also added a new task, `rails items:update_cached_fields`, which needs
to be run after this change, because it affects the value of
`Item#predicted_fully_modeled?`.

Eyeballing the updated search results for `-is:modeled`, this feels
pretty close? I'm guessing it's not perfect (e.g. maybe a pet type we
got modeled late into its existence, or some items that just never did
fit a certain pet), but feels pretty good.

I also know we had the "modeling hints" override in Impress 2020, which
we aren't reading yet. We should probably take that into account here
too!
2024-11-19 16:41:50 -08:00
91851bc340 Add tests for Maraquan item modeling predictions
I also added a test I forgot for the standard case: when you've modeled
each individual species.
2024-11-19 13:31:34 -08:00
f90380c4e6 Add tests for item modeling predictions
The stuff on the homepage! I'm also thinking about how to use these for
better discovery of items that need more modeling.
2024-11-19 12:10:49 -08:00
217d25edab Handle new colors/species in the Rainbow Pool
Oh right, yeah, we like to do things gracefully around here when
there's no corresponding color/species record yet!

Paying more attention to this, I'm thinking like… it could be a cool
idea to, in modeling, *create* the new color/species record, and just
not have all the attributes filled in yet? Especially now that we're
less dependent on attributes like `standard` to be set for correct
functioning.

But for now, we follow the same strategy we do elsewhere in the app: a
pet type can have `color_id` and `species_id` that don't correspond to
a real record, and we cover over that smoothly.
2024-11-15 19:56:07 -08:00
0b3dd02323 Add failing test for modeling bug where we break existing connections
As I'm writing out my solution for this, I'm almost wondering if it's
time for the refactor I've been Theoretically Planning Someday, to move
items to a real `ItemAppearance` model in the database similar to
`PetState`… Hmm hmm hmm…

For now though, I'm taking a break!
2024-11-06 14:08:32 -08:00
06721f77e9 Add alt style modeling tests
I didn't do the assets part of it yet, just the style object!
2024-10-29 22:20:43 -07:00
8902527438 Basic modeling spec for my pet, matts_bat
No items yet, just putting in the very basics of biology, more
shortform than the Thyassa case
2024-10-24 15:37:57 -07:00
5b1d1f0695 Add assets to modeling tests, and also uhh some other fixes
I forget, there was some tricky debugging about getting the fixtures
right, I think the previous commit doesn't *actually* pass from a clean
setting. Ah well, looks good now!
2024-10-21 16:46:10 -07:00