Commit graph

32 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matchu
bc5241d087 Oops, add unowned & unwanted support to search!
Uhhh idk how I messed this up, but right, wanting is not the opposite of owning, LOL!
2023-07-29 13:10:18 -07:00
Matchu
ca6a573c0a Add user:owns/wants back to item search
Not so bad, using a condition on `has_many` `through` was a cute trick!!
2023-07-28 15:06:33 -07:00
Matchu
070599e2ca Add fits and not_fits back to item search
Some fun stuff here to figure out how to API this out well, but I'm pretty pleased with where it ended up!
2023-07-28 14:45:10 -07:00
Matchu
5c119abcd8 Add restricts filter back to item search 2023-07-26 12:41:37 -07:00
Matchu
db9e3dfb53 Add occupies filter back to item search
Mostly adapting what was already there!
2023-07-26 12:28:25 -07:00
Matchu
d12b21896c Add is:pb back to item search 2023-07-26 11:51:52 -07:00
Matchu
4d722dd5c5 Simplify filter API a bit
Not doing the tricks with `is_positive` anymore, instead just calling different functions altogether at the call site.

Also, instead of classes, I feel like this is a lot more concise to just write as class methods that create certain instances of a trivial `Filter` data class. Without the tricks of `is_positive` in play, the value of classes goes way down imo.
2023-07-26 11:47:00 -07:00
Matchu
2ac806333d Move Item name search logic to model scope 2023-07-26 11:15:35 -07:00
Matchu
c04bab55d0 Improve is:X failure message 2023-07-26 11:06:36 -07:00
Matchu
20bedf8f59 Start building new item search
Just name field right now, more to come! A lot deleted lol
2023-07-22 19:01:40 -07:00
9ca68b02b2 parse "fits:8-bit-chomby" as "fits 8-bit chomby" rather than "fits 8 bit"
The "fits:8-bit-chomby" search filter was being read as color=8, species=bit.
Now, we split from the right-hand side of the filter instead.

Still a problem for anyone who explicitly types the Spanish/Portuguese
ordering of "fits:chomby-8-bits", but I'm okay with this cheap fix, since
I bet literally nobody has done that in the past month, if ever :P
2015-04-07 23:13:22 -05:00
44ff466a64 advanced search by pet type fit :) 2014-04-05 18:48:20 -05:00
0fe31ee79a basic fits functionality in search 2014-04-05 17:43:54 -05:00
d47ec7a0cd when advanced query is empty, go blank instead of saying no results 2014-04-02 20:42:49 -05:00
d7af6cfd4a populate occupies/restricts selects 2014-04-02 20:26:53 -05:00
f4c435c3cd handle user filters 2014-04-02 10:32:13 -05:00
1d11cf6edc better handling of i18n and labels and resource filters and junk 2014-04-02 10:32:13 -05:00
170b7fa6f5 can search items with a form-based query instead of text-based 2014-04-02 10:32:13 -05:00
4c208c9ac3 instead of returning an empty item list on contradiction, return an empty proxy collection 2013-07-03 18:17:16 -07:00
e42de795dd Use item proxies for JSON caching
That is, once we get our list of IDs from the search engine, only
fetch records whose JSON we don't already have cached.

It's simpler here to use as_json, but it'd probably be even faster
if I figure out how to serve a plain JSON string from a Rails
controller. In the meantime, requests of entirely cached items
are coming in at about 85ms on average on my box (dev, cache
classes, many items), about 10ms better than the last
iteration.
2013-06-26 23:01:12 -07:00
9d3acf660c in item queries, ignore name filters that are too small or too large 2013-03-29 17:05:14 -05:00
9c6797699e enable hangers in development, disable in production 2013-01-29 23:06:37 -06:00
934923b0f6 sigh. disable user filters again :( 2013-01-28 18:30:04 -06:00
2486e46a25 re-enable user filters, woo 2013-01-28 16:25:00 -06:00
8d72bf6353 temporarily disable user-filters in item search 2013-01-27 01:45:18 -06:00
e86bcfaf54 improve globalized search queries: normalize input, fallbacks, etc 2013-01-26 09:52:58 -06:00
4e0ce6c20b bugfix: zone-not-found raises error again 2013-01-25 11:15:54 -06:00
7f18fe12c1 user:owns, user:wants queries 2013-01-25 10:35:35 -06:00
b2822d901b fix n+1 query for translations on items#index 2013-01-24 18:26:00 -06:00
26ac3782ec move zones to database 2013-01-24 18:26:00 -06:00
cded361f73 update item search to original name-matching behavior
We originally had a regression on name-matching, where, among
other issues, `straw hat` returned items containing both "straw"
and "hat", which isn't really helpful behavior since we're sorting
alphabetically. Now, `straw hat` behaves as expected.

Additionally, "phrases like these" behave as expected, too.
2013-01-24 18:24:35 -06:00
6e09b8bc10 globalized search first draft
Confirmed features:
    * Output (retrieval, sorting, etc.)
    * Name (positive and negative, but new behavior)
    * Flags (positive and negative)

Planned features:
    * users:owns, user:wants

Known issues:
    * Sets are broken
        * Don't render properly
        * Shouldn't actually be done as joined sets, anyway, since
          we actually want (set1_zone1 OR set1_zone2) AND
          (set2_zone1 OR set2_zone2), which will require breaking
          it into multiple terms queries.
    * Name has regressed: ignores phrases, doesn't require *all*
      words. While we're breaking sets into multiple queries,
      maybe we'll do something similar for name. In fact, we
      really kinda have to if we're gonna keep sorting by name,
      since "straw hat" returns all hats. Eww.
2013-01-24 18:24:35 -06:00