Add logic to infer the base for Dyeworks items

This works for most of the current 1,094 Dyeworks items! But there are
a few exceptions, for cases where the base item name is not quite the
same (e.g. the Dyeworks version is more concise). Maybe we'll add a
database field to override this?

- Dyeworks Baby Blue: Baby Valentine Jumper
- Dyeworks Baby Pink: Baby Valentine Jumper
- Dyeworks Black: Field of Flowers
- Dyeworks Black: Games Master Challenge 2010 Lulu Shirt
- Dyeworks Blue: Field of Flowers
- Dyeworks Blue: Stars and Glitter Facepaint
- Dyeworks Brown: Hanging Winter Candles Garland
- Dyeworks Green: Stars and Glitter Facepaint
- Dyeworks Magenta: Lovely Berry Blush
- Dyeworks Orange & Pink: Winter Lights Effects
- Dyeworks Orange: Games Master Challenge 2010 Lulu Shirt
- Dyeworks Peach: Lovely Berry Blush
- Dyeworks Purple: Baby Valentine Jumper
- Dyeworks Purple: Games Master Challenge 2010 Lulu Shirt
- Dyeworks Purple: Hanging Winter Candles Garland
- Dyeworks Purple: Stars and Glitter Facepaint
- Dyeworks Red & Green: Winter Lights Effects
- Dyeworks Silver: Hanging Winter Candles Garland
- Dyeworks Soft Pink: Lovely Berry Blush
- Dyeworks Yellow & Magenta: Winter Lights Effects
- Dyeworks Yellow: Field of Flowers
This commit is contained in:
Emi Matchu 2024-06-07 19:20:21 -07:00
parent 341869fb17
commit 68cb44d159

View file

@ -195,6 +195,26 @@ class Item < ApplicationRecord
nc_mall_record.present?
end
def dyeworks?
dyeworks_base_item.present?
end
DYEWORKS_NAME_PATTERN = %r{
^(
# Most Dyeworks items have a colon in the name.
Dyeworks\s+(?<color>.+?:)\s*(?<base>.+)
|
# But sometimes they omit it. If so, assume the first word is the color!
Dyeworks\s+(?<color>\S+)\s*(?<base>.+)
)$
}x
def dyeworks_base_item
name_match = name.match(DYEWORKS_NAME_PATTERN)
return nil if name_match.nil?
Item.find_by_name(name_match["base"])
end
def owned?
@owned || false
end