impress/app/controllers/auth_users_controller.rb

66 lines
2 KiB
Ruby
Raw Permalink Normal View History

class AuthUsersController < ApplicationController
before_action :authenticate_user!, except: [:new, :create]
def create
@auth_user = AuthUser.create(auth_user_params)
if @auth_user.persisted?
sign_in :auth_user, @auth_user
flash[:notice] = "Welcome to Dress to Impress, #{@auth_user.name}! 💖"
redirect_to root_path
else
render action: :new, status: :unprocessable_entity
end
end
def edit
# For the edit form, the auth user *is* the persisted auth user.
@persisted_auth_user = current_auth_user
@auth_user = @persisted_auth_user
end
def new
@auth_user = AuthUser.new
end
def update
# When updating, we hold onto the original `@persisted_auth_user`, then
# make our changes to `@auth_user`. That way, the form can check the *live*
# value of `uses_password?` to decide whether to show the "Current
# password" field, instead of getting thrown off if the password changed
# but the record didn't get saved.
#
# HACK: Is there a way to get the kind of copy we want for real? `dup`
# actually returns a *new* unsaved record with the same attributes.
@auth_user = load_auth_user
@persisted_auth_user = @auth_user.dup
if @auth_user.update_with_password(auth_user_params)
# NOTE: Changing the password will sign you out, so make sure we stay
# signed in!
bypass_sign_in @auth_user, scope: :auth_user
flash[:notice] = "Settings successfully saved."
redirect_to action: :edit
else
render action: :edit, status: :unprocessable_entity
end
end
private
def auth_user_params
params.require(:auth_user).permit(:name, :email, :password,
:password_confirmation, :current_password)
end
def load_auth_user
# Well, what we *actually* do is just use `current_auth_user`, and enforce
# that the provided user ID matches. The user ID param is only really for
# REST semantics and such!
raise AccessDenied unless auth_user_signed_in?
raise AccessDenied unless current_auth_user.id == params[:id].to_i
current_auth_user
end
end