We're in the process of migrating away from translating these records,
because Neopets hasn't supported non-English languages in many years,
and it'll simplify our code and database lookups.
In Main DTI, we already wrote code to copy these fields onto the main
records and keep them in sync for now; now, once DTI 2020 isn't
referencing them anymore, it should be safe for the main app to drop
the tables altogether.
Note that some Prettier changes got mixed in here and that's fine!
I also wasn't suuuper careful testing these, most of them seem to be
trivially testable by just loading the homepage or doing a few basic
wardrobe actions, and the others are in Discord support log actions
that aren't enabled in development mode, so I'm just like… ehh I'll do
a couple support actions after deploy and see that they don't crash!
Note also the change to the public-data-constants, because we've
started (but not finished) moving name fields into the rows themselves
and deprecating the translations.
Specifically, we rename the dev database to `openneo_impress` for consistency with the main app, and create a second schema file for `openneo_id`, so we can do local account creation.
Hey finally! I got in the mood and did it, after… a year? idk lol
The button should only appear for outfits that are already saved, that are owned by you. And the server enforces it!
I also added a new util function to give actually useful error messages when the GraphQL server throws an error. Might be wise to use this in more places where we're currently just using `error.message`!
Hope it actually work-works lol
Did some refactors in useOutfitState to support the new reset action we do after auto-saving, in case the server tweaked things like the name.
I wanted the ability to clear out closet list text for Support users, and figured I should just build the UI for end users too, and grant Support users the same access!
I narrowed down the problem to the fact that we were joining in pet types against assets, and *then* running GROUP and DISTINCT and everything. Assets x compatible species/color pairs is a LOT of rows!
Here, we instead get all the relevant body IDs first, and *then* match them against pet types—which we fetch in one batch to match body to canonical species/color.
I'm also trashing the weird caching mechanism we did here, because in practice it doesn't seem reliable anyway. If anything, I'd want to look at stronger CDN caching. (I made a small improvement to the caching annotation, but ultimately it still doesn't matter, because this query uses logged-in stuff and always comes out max-age=0 anyway.)
